Rebutted to Alex

So, before I rebut against Alex's blog post, i first have to say that i agree with what he says. However, for sake of getting a good grade in this class, i will pretend to be against this. Even so, a great debater should be able to think about both sides of an argument.

First off, my open begins his statement with that he would not want his DNA to manipulated. However, what if it is a matter of life or death? What if the DNA manipulation can help the baby but have negative effects as well like a problem with sight or hearing or skin problems etc. The life of a child is more important than any negative mutation of minor consequences.

another thing is what does it matter that a parent changes the DNA to meet their standards? So what? Nothing is wrong with that. It just seems to raise moral and ethical questions. But, what would the effect be if the baby comes out blonde even though they were support to come out a brown haired one? So, the question i guess remains with the parents and weather or not they want to change the DNA or not.

so, the last point i want to make is this ethics problem i mentioned earlier. Is it really un-ethical to change the DNA of a baby? Well, yes it can be if it were harmful. However, the manipulation of DNA to change something as silly as hair or eye color is not harmful. Also, my opponent says that the parents will need to tell there children what they did, but i think that they do not. It dose not seem that important to tell them what happened.

so, to conclude, I believe that it is ultimately up to the parents whether or not hey want to change the DNA sequience so that they could get the ultimate baby they want.





Again, just want to say that i do agree with what Alex says, this is just for sake of the class.